By Maurice A . Finocchiaro
A examine of the relationship among Gaetano Mosca and Antonio Gramsci, holding that they either belong to an analogous political culture of democratic elitism. It argues that Gramsci's political concept is a positive critique of Mosca's.
Read Online or Download Beyond Right and Left: Democratic Elitism in Mosca and Gramsci (Italian Literature and Thought) PDF
Similar history & theory books
"Nietzsche and criminal concept" is an anthology designed to supply criminal and socio-legal students with a feeling of the very wide variety of initiatives and questions in whose pursuit Nietsche's paintings will be worthwhile. From clinical ethics to criminology, from the systemic anti-Semitism of felony codes bobbing up in Christian cultures, to the main points of highbrow estate debates approximately regulating using culturally major items, the members (from the fields of legislations, philosophy, criminology, cultural experiences, and literary experiences) display and enact this sort of creativity that Nietzsche linked to the free-spirits to whom he addressed a few of his most vital paintings.
Although he died as Benito Mussolini's prisoner, leaving in basic terms newspaper articles and fragmentary notes, Antonio Gramsci is now visible because the most vital Marxist philosopher due to the fact that Lenin. This quantity is the 1st English translation of his writings on tradition, organically and coherently edited from his journalism and his legal Notebooks.
Sozialistische und kommunistische Theorien entwickelten sich in Europa seit Babeuf in der Französischen Revolution. Varianten sozialistischer Theoretiker im Kommunismus, Anarchismus und Sozialdemokratismus bekämpften einander erbittert in allen europäischen Ländern von Spanien bis Russland. In diesem Band werden die Hauptformen sozialistischer und kommunistischer Parteien bis hin zu den „Internationalen“ in Beziehung zu den herausragenden Denkern der Linken gesetzt.
Even though it originated in theological debates, the final will eventually turned probably the most celebrated and denigrated ideas rising from early sleek political proposal. Jean-Jacques Rousseau made it the significant component of his political concept, and it took on a lifetime of its personal in the course of the French Revolution, earlier than being subjected to generations of embody or opprobrium.
- Development and Main Outlines of Rawls's Theory of Justice (Philosophy of Rawls, Volume 1)
- Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics
- Abraham Lincoln and American political religion
- The Poverty of American Politics: A Theoretical Interpretation
- Before Marx: Socialism and Communism in France, 1830–48
- From Revolution to War: State Relations in a World of Change
Additional resources for Beyond Right and Left: Democratic Elitism in Mosca and Gramsci (Italian Literature and Thought)
Html6/20/2010 3:19:51 PM next page > page_20 < previous page page_20 next page > Page 20 proximation, whereas the obligation of a scholar is to try to penetrate beneath the surface of phenomena and to deepen the analysis of superficial appearances. In other words, Mosca is often viewed as a classic exponent of the Right. 21 We could almost speak of him as a patron saint of the Right, were it not that his life does not exhibit the tragedy and high drama that Gramsci had to endure, and so Mosca does not lend himself to being mythologized as readily as Gramsci.
Nor was he at fault for having made value judgments different from those made by others. It is useful at this point to give a sketch of Mosca's justification of these judgments. For in a certain sense he did indeed advance all three. " Now, not only is there an intimate connection between this justification and this elucidation, but it turns out that all three derive from or reflect the same fundamental principle. And this will be another avenue by which we shall, again, be led to examine the other elements of Mosca's political science, besides the fundamental elitist principle.
This argument would depend on the alternative explanation for the agreed-upon generalization. The distinction between an empirical fact and a theoretical explanation is an important and interesting one, and I am far from denying it. Thus one of Hook's points is acceptable. However, one problem with his criticism is that Mosca's explanation of his own "law" does not rely simply on an appeal to human nature. I believe his explanation, in the precise sense in which it is distinguished from the fact-to-be-explained, would be essentially the one put forward by Michels, which we have already summarized.